Practice question
A successor Ombudsman reviews an earlier office resolution through a legally available process. A party says a predecessor's resolution can never be reconsidered under any circumstances merely because the officeholder changed. Which is best under DOF-RIPS?
- Every predecessor resolution is eternally unreviewable
- The office may review or modify prior rulings within legal bounds; succession alone supplies no categorical prohibition
- A new officeholder may ignore all finality rules
- The President may dictate every result
- The complainant may revise the resolution privately
Legal references
- DOF-RIPS v. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 270948, April 2, 2025, main opinion: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/apr2025/gr_270948_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.