Philippine Bar review · Topic
Administrative Jurisdiction
Explore Administrative Jurisdiction in The Ombudsman and the Special Prosecutor (RA 6770) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which group is expressly excepted from the Ombudsman's disciplinary authority in RA 6770, Section 21? Multiple Choice Easy
- Which institution has constitutional administrative supervision over courts and court personnel? Multiple Choice Easy
- Ledesma rejected which characterization of the Ombudsman's disciplinary authority over covered personnel? Multiple Choice Easy
- A covered executive employee argues that a lawful Ombudsman disciplinary disposition may always be ignored by the agenc… Multiple Choice Medium
- A complaint seeks direct administrative dismissal of a trial judge by the Ombudsman for judicial-service misconduct. Wh… Multiple Choice Medium
- A complainant asks the Ombudsman to remove an impeachable official through an ordinary administrative penalty. The offi… Multiple Choice Hard
- An administrative case against a covered local official is met only with the claim that Section 21 covers appointive of… Multiple Choice Hard
- Explain Section 21's disciplinary coverage and its express institutional exclusions. Essay Medium
- Why does Ledesma not authorize the Ombudsman to discipline every judge? Essay Medium
- Distinguish investigating serious misconduct for a possible impeachment complaint from directly removing the official a… Essay Medium
- What procedural standard does RA 6770 Section 23(1) expressly require for Ombudsman administrative investigations? Multiple Choice Easy
- Which characterization of a proper preventive suspension is recognized in Carpio-Morales? Multiple Choice Easy