Philippine Bar review · Topic
Jurisdiction
Explore Jurisdiction in Discipline for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under Article VIII, Section 6, which institution has administrative supervision over all courts and their personnel? Multiple Choice Easy
- Which group is expressly excluded from the Ombudsman's disciplinary authority under Section 21 of RA 6770? Multiple Choice Easy
- How does Section 9 of the 2025 RACCS describe an agency disciplining authority's original jurisdiction over its respect… Multiple Choice Easy
- A covered appointive national-agency employee argues that the agency's proper disciplining authority cannot hear any ad… Multiple Choice Medium
- An ordinary Cabinet secretary facing an administrative complaint argues that Cabinet rank alone excludes the office fro… Multiple Choice Medium
- In a proper administrative case against a covered executive official, the Ombudsman imposes a lawful suspension after d… Multiple Choice Hard
- A complaint alleges serious misconduct by an impeachable Constitutional Commissioner. The Ombudsman invokes Section 22 … Multiple Choice Hard
- Explain why a disciplinary complaint's reference to RA 6713 does not by itself identify one tribunal with unlimited jur… Essay Medium
- A covered agency official claims that the existence of CSC disciplinary jurisdiction necessarily makes every proceeding… Essay Medium
- Distinguish the Ombudsman's ordinary disciplinary authority from its power to investigate serious misconduct by an impe… Essay Medium
- Under RA 6770 Section 22, may the Ombudsman include a private person in an investigation alleging conspiracy with a gov… Multiple Choice Easy
- What does Section 23 require of Ombudsman administrative investigations? Multiple Choice Easy