Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Administrative Supervision over Lower Courts

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A national executive office issues a general personnel circular directing it to impose disciplinary penalties on trial-court employees for their court-record management. Its sole theory is that a broad reference to “all government employees” overrides the Judiciary’s specific constitutional arrangement. No Supreme Court authorization or action is identified. Which analysis is correct?
  1. A general circular can transfer any constitutional power by implication.
  2. The specific Supreme Court supervisory assignment cannot be displaced by that executive circular’s broad wording.
  3. All court personnel become executive staff whenever paperwork is involved.
  4. Constitutional supervision depends entirely on the employee’s preferred branch.
  5. Only the circular’s font size determines whether it prevails.

Legal references

  • 1987 Constitution, Article VIII, Sections 5(6), 6 and 11: https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html
  • Maceda v. Vasquez, G.R. No. 102781, April 22, 1993, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1993/apr1993/gr_102781_1993.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.