Philippine Bar review · Topic

Political Question Doctrine

Explore Political Question Doctrine in Judicial Review for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Tañada v. Cuenco distinguishes a political question concerned with what from a justiciable question of legality?
  2. What is the significance of the 1987 Constitution's expanded grave-abuse definition for political-question arguments?
  3. Which statement about a dispute involving elected officials is correct?
  4. A litigant concedes that a program is authorized, constitutionally compliant and free from grave abuse, but asks a cour…
  5. A public body argues that compliance with an express constitutional voting requirement is solely political because its …
  6. A constitutional provision limits an institution's discretion in selecting members of a public tribunal. In a proper ca…
  7. The President calls out military forces to assist police. A challenger in a proper proceeding alleges that the decision…
  8. Explain why an issue may involve politics yet still present a justiciable constitutional question. Use Tañada v. Cuenco…
  9. Does expanded judicial power mean that every policy disagreement is now for courts to resolve on its merits? Explain wi…
  10. A government respondent calls a dispute a political question but identifies no constitutional commitment of unlimited d…
  11. When a court decides whether a government actor complied with an express constitutional restriction, what kind of inqui…
  12. Does a court’s conclusion that an issue is justiciable necessarily mean the challenged governmental action is unconstit…