Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Confirmation by Commission on Appointments

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

An adviser prepares one confirmation checklist for three presidential appointments: Civil Service Commission Chair, Ombudsman and a consul. All appointees meet their substantive qualifications. The adviser marks every appointment “no confirmation” because all are filled by the President. Which correction is constitutionally accurate?
  1. The CSC Chair and consul require the specified consent, while the Ombudsman’s appointment expressly requires no confirmation.
  2. All three require a plebiscite instead.
  3. Only the Ombudsman requires Commission on Appointments consent.
  4. The President’s signature necessarily eliminates every consent requirement.
  5. All three require approval of every Senator separately.

Legal references

  • 1987 Constitution, Article VII, Section 16: https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html
  • 1987 Constitution, Article IX-B, Section 1(2) and Article XI, Section 9: https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.