Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Ad Interim Appointments

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

How does Matibag characterize a valid ad interim appointment?
  1. As necessarily temporary and revocable at presidential pleasure after qualification
  2. As a permanent appointment, though subject to constitutional termination conditions
  3. As a private employment contract
  4. As merely a nomination with no immediate effect
  5. As automatically immune from Commission on Appointments action

Legal references

  • 1987 Constitution, Article VII, Section 16: https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html
  • Matibag v. Benipayo, G.R. No. 149036, April 2, 2002, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2002/apr2002/gr_149036_2002.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.