Practice question
An analyst describes Aguinaldo as a merits decision conclusively approving every hypothetical operational detail of prison voting. Which correction is necessary?
- The Court actually abolished every jail polling place
- The Court convicted every petitioner
- The Court decided every future dispute in advance
- The case contains no procedural analysis
- The petition was dismissed for unmet review requisites, and the Court did not reach the substantive issues
Legal references
- Aguinaldo v. New Bilibid Prison, G.R. No. 221201, March 29, 2022, main resolution: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/18/68250; main resolution, quoted Resolution 9371 Rule 1 Section 2 and judicial-review disposition.
- RA 8189: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1996/ra_8189_1996.html; Section 11(a).
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.