Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Inclusion and Exclusion Proceedings

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A timely petition challenges whether a named voter is real or fictitious. The challenged person does not appear on the hearing date. Counsel claims Section 32 makes the absence conclusive and irrebuttable proof. Which is correct?
  1. The provision describes prima facie evidence of fictitiousness, not an irrebuttable declaration
  2. Absence automatically proves every criminal charge
  3. Prima facie means no contrary evidence can exist
  4. Absence conclusively voids every precinct registration
  5. The statute forbids considering absence

Legal references

  • RA 8189: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1996/ra_8189_1996.html; Sections 32-33.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.