Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Quo Warranto

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

Two timely ordinary electoral quo warranto petitions raise personal ineligibility: one against a city mayor and one against a barangay chair. Both invoke Section 253, and no Rule 66 issue is presented. Counsel insists that one forum must originally decide both because each is a local executive. Which allocation follows the law?
  1. Both belong originally to the Senate
  2. Both belong originally to the barangay council
  3. Both belong originally to the Commission on Audit
  4. Both necessarily belong originally to the RTC
  5. The city contest belongs originally to COMELEC and the barangay contest to the metropolitan or municipal trial court

Legal references

  • Batas Pambansa Blg. 881, Sections 5-6, 68 and 253: https://lawphil.net/statutes/bataspam/bp1985/bp_881_1985.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.