Practice question
Explain Miguel v. Ogena's distinction between the ordinary election quo warranto remedy and a Rule 66 action concerning a defect that arises or is discovered during incumbency. Avoid treating the distinction as a universal extension of election deadlines.
Legal references
- Batas Pambansa Blg. 881, section 253, https://lawphil.net/statutes/bataspam/bp1985/bp_881_1985.html
- Miguel v. Ogena, G.R. No. 256053, November 5, 2024, https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/nov2024/gr_256053_2024.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.