Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Quo Warranto

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A qualified voter did not run for the office but timely seeks election quo warranto alleging the proclaimed local winner's statutory ineligibility. The winner argues that only a defeated rival candidate can ever file. Which response is correct?
  1. Section 253's voter-standing rule is not limited to a defeated rival, subject to all applicable requirements.
  2. Only candidates have political rights.
  3. A voter may never question eligibility.
  4. The winner can select who may sue.
  5. The petition automatically succeeds because a voter filed.

Legal references

  • Batas Pambansa Blg. 881, section 253, https://lawphil.net/statutes/bataspam/bp1985/bp_881_1985.html
  • Miguel v. Ogena, G.R. No. 256053, November 5, 2024, https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/nov2024/gr_256053_2024.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.