Philippine Bar review · Topic

Pre-proclamation Controversies

Explore Pre-proclamation Controversies in Remedies and Jurisdiction for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under the automated-election pre-proclamation framework in Resolution 8804, which two issues are covered?
  2. Which body has jurisdiction over the covered pre-proclamation controversies under Resolution 8804?
  3. What procedural vehicle does Resolution 8804 prescribe to raise the illegality of the board's composition or proceeding…
  4. A candidate timely challenges a board member's lack of a legally required qualification through the proper verified pro…
  5. In a national election covered by RA 7166, Section 15, an interested person identifies a manifest arithmetic error in t…
  6. A losing candidate in an automated local election labels a demand for examination of thousands of ballots a pre-proclam…
  7. A verified petition alleges with supporting evidence that a board's canvass was a sham: the outcome was predetermined, …
  8. State the two issues covered by the automated-election pre-proclamation framework in Resolution 8804 and distinguish th…
  9. Explain RA 7166, Section 15's restriction on pre-proclamation cases for President, Vice-President, Senator and House Me…
  10. A candidate claims a board conducted a predetermined sham canvass through threats and inadequate notice. Explain why th…
  11. In Resolution 8804’s automated-election pre-proclamation framework, how many counsel may argue for each covered party, …
  12. Under Resolution 8804, Rule 3, may the board impose oral-argument time limits to prevent dilatory action?