Practice question
A challenge attacks COMELEC's approval of wholesale substitute party-list nominees for violating substitution rules and conflict-of-interest statutes, but alleges no material misrepresentation in anyone's qualifications. It is argued that a Rule 5 Section 1 cancellation petition necessarily supplies an adequate remedy for that entire challenge. What did the main decision in Duterte Youth explain?
- Rule 5 Section 1 automatically covers every act involving a party-list.
- Qualification misrepresentation and any substitution objection are legally identical.
- The limited ground does not fit that substitution challenge; the Court examined the proper extraordinary remedy on the circumstances before it.
- No court can ever examine any substitution approval.
- A party-list can avoid all rules after receiving votes.
Legal references
- Duterte Youth Party-List v. COMELEC, G.R. Nos. 261123 and 261876, August 20, 2024, main decision, limited Rule 5 ground: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/69690
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.