Philippine Bar review · Topic
Nuisance Candidates
Explore Nuisance Candidates in Candidacy for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which situation is a statutory nuisance-candidacy ground under Section 69 when established through the proper proceedin…
- How may a Section 69 nuisance-candidacy proceeding be initiated under the statutory text?
- Under Mustapha, what evidentiary showing must COMELEC make when it initiates the Section 69 petition?
- A senatorial aspirant is declared nuisance solely because she fails to prove financial capacity to sustain a nationwide…
- Two bona fide candidates have similar surnames. The evidence establishes genuine efforts by each to run, and no deliber…
- COMELEC's Law Department files a nuisance petition but presents only bare assertions that an aspirant is obscure and un…
- A wealthy aspirant arranges a sham candidacy expressly to confuse voters through a near-identical candidate name. After…
- Explain the statutory grounds for nuisance candidacy and the process and proof required when COMELEC itself initiates t…
- An aspirant is declared nuisance solely for failure to prove sufficient campaign wealth. Explain Marquez's rule and whe…
- Two aspirants have similar surnames. Explain why the tribunal must examine the evidence and statutory purpose rather th…
- Under Mustapha, must COMELEC as tribunal independently consider the law and facts rather than simply adopt a subordinat…
- Must a nuisance decision explain the issues and reasons sufficiently for the parties to understand it?