Practice question
Explain why Sarigumba’s no-follow-up reasoning should not be quoted as if it made invocation timing and respondent-caused delay irrelevant in every case, considering the June 2026 Marcos decision.
Legal references
- Sarigumba v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 263615, August 19, 2025, main decision: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/70155
- People v. Imelda Romualdez Marcos, G.R. Nos. 243402–08, June 10, 2026, main decision: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/70586
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.