Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Rights to Speedy Trial and Speedy Disposition of Cases

Multiple Choice Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

A delay claim counts two years of stipulated pre-complaint fact-finding as if they were all post-complaint preliminary-investigation inaction. Which first correction follows Tumang and Colis’s reiterated framework?
  1. No phase distinction is legally possible
  2. Count the same period twice
  3. Treat all fact-finding as trial time
  4. Dismiss without identifying the complaint date
  5. Identify the formal-complaint boundary and exclude the stipulated earlier fact-finding period from that computation

Legal references

  • People v. Sandiganbayan (Tumang and Colis), G.R. No. 274922, February 17, 2025, main decision: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/69832

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.