Philippine Bar review · Topic
Rights of the Accused
Explore Rights of the Accused in CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What presumption does Article III, Section 14(2), expressly provide for an accused in a criminal prosecution?
- Which accused's right directly concerns knowing the charge that must be defended against?
- Which mechanism is expressly protected to obtain witnesses and evidence for the defense?
- An accused is told that because the prosecution considers the case simple, the accused must personally defend at trial …
- An accused has been arraigned and duly notified of trial but deliberately fails to appear without justification. Does t…
- The accused has never been arraigned. After learning that the accused left the country, the prosecution asks the court …
- A prosecutor asks the judge to convict immediately because the accused has remained silent and public officials believe…
- A trial judge says that informing the accused of the charge is unnecessary because defense counsel can simply listen to…
- State the constitutional conditions for trial to proceed despite an accused's absence. Explain why an unarraigned accus…
- An accused identifies a relevant defense witness and a relevant document in another person's possession. The judge refu…
- If an accused elects to testify in the accused’s own behalf, Rule 115 subjects that testimony to what?
- How does Rule 115 formulate the accused’s right to appeal?