Philippine Bar review · Topic

Right to Information (See also EO 2, s. 2016; RA 6713, Sec. 5(e))

Explore Right to Information (See also EO 2, s. 2016; RA 6713, Sec. 5(e)) in CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. The constitutional right to information concerns which subject?
  2. Executive Order No. 2, s. 2016 directly covers which branch?
  3. RA 6713, Section 5(e) requires public documents to be available for public inspection within what period of the day?
  4. An executive agency denies an FOI request solely because disclosure might embarrass its head, identifying no constituti…
  5. A person demands that an agency release legally confidential personal information merely because it is stored in an off…
  6. A Filipino requests a government contract from an executive department, supplies the required identifying details and d…
  7. An executive office holds a public procurement record containing both project details and legally protected personal in…
  8. Distinguish the constitutional right to information from EO 2's executive implementation.
  9. An agency invokes RA 6713's public-document duty to justify releasing legally confidential information without analysis…
  10. What should a written denial under EO 2 communicate, and why is an unexplained personal refusal inadequate?
  11. Under EO No. 2, Section 10, may a covered office charge a fee merely for accepting an access request?
  12. What ordinary response period does EO No. 2, Section 9(d) state for a fully compliant request, subject to its extension…