Practice question
Does the fact that seized evidence is relevant answer every constitutional exclusion question?
- Yes; relevance automatically cures every unlawful government search.
- Yes; every relevant item is constitutionally admissible in every setting.
- No; constitutional acquisition and the proper party’s rights remain distinct from relevance.
- Yes; only document length matters after relevance is shown.
- No, because no relevant item may ever be used.
Legal references
- 1987 Constitution, Article III, Sections 2 and 3(2): https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html
- Stonehill v. Diokno, G.R. No. L-19550, June 19, 1967, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1967/jun1967/gr_l-19550_1967.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.