Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Right Against Self-Incrimination

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

In a noncustodial administrative hearing, an ordinary witness is compelled to answer a particular question whose truthful answer would expose the witness to criminal liability. No immunity removes the risk. The tribunal says Section 17 applies only inside criminal courtrooms. Which is correct?
  1. An administrative label eliminates the privilege.
  2. The testimonial privilege may be invoked against the particular criminally incriminating answer in this proceeding.
  3. Every administrative question is automatically privileged.
  4. Only the employer may decide whether the witness has constitutional rights.
  5. The witness becomes criminally convicted by invoking the privilege.

Legal references

  • Fajardo v. People, G.R. No. 239823, September 25, 2019, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2019/sep2019/gr_239823_2019.html
  • 1987 Constitution: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/3/353 Article III, Section 17.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.