Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Right Against Self-Incrimination

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

An ordinary witness in a civil case is asked a specific question whose truthful answer would tend to incriminate that witness for a crime. No immunity removes the risk. May the witness invoke Article III, Section 17, as to that answer?
  1. No, because the pending case is civil.
  2. No, because every subpoena extinguishes constitutional rights.
  3. No, unless the witness has already been convicted.
  4. Yes; the privilege can apply to the particular incriminating question.
  5. Yes; therefore the witness may necessarily refuse every unrelated nonincriminating question.

Legal references

  • Fajardo v. People, G.R. No. 239823, September 25, 2019, main decision, testimonial compulsion and witnesses: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2019/sep2019/gr_239823_2019.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.