Philippine Bar review · Topic

Right Against Excessive Fines, Cruel and Inhuman Punishment

Page 2 of practice questions on Right Against Excessive Fines, Cruel and Inhuman Punishment in CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. Browse published questions and explore…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Does RA 9745’s definition of torture encompass severe mental suffering as well as physical suffering?
  2. A law using non-RPC penalty terminology formerly prescribed death. The court asks only which Section 2 replacement appl…
  3. A custodian denies that severe intentional mental suffering can be torture because no physical mark appears. The statut…
  4. A confession is proved to have been obtained through torture. Prosecutors offer it against the tortured person as the s…
  5. A torture-obtained statement is offered in a prosecution against the alleged torturer to prove the torture, rather than…
  6. Distinguish RA 9346’s two replacement penalties for death, using the violated law’s penalty nomenclature as the stated …
  7. A custodian claims conduct cannot be torture without visible physical injuries. Severe intentional mental suffering and…
  8. Explain RA 9745, Section 8’s exclusion of torture-obtained confessions and its exception concerning proceedings against…