Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Right Against Double Jeopardy

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

After a valid charge, plea and full trial in a competent court, an accused is acquitted. The State seeks a new trial for the identical offense merely because it disagrees with the evidence assessment; no due-process denial is alleged or proved. Which is best?
  1. Disagreement automatically authorizes retrial
  2. Every acquittal is provisional
  3. The prosecutor may erase the acquittal
  4. The second case is necessarily a civil case
  5. The ordinary finality-of-acquittal and double-jeopardy rules bar that attempt

Legal references

  • Rules of Court, Rule 117, Section 7: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
  • Bakal v. People, G.R. No. 259277, February 2026, main opinion: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2026/feb2026/gr_259277_2026.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.