Practice question
A court acquits after hearing the prosecution's evidence and allowing its full presentation. The State files certiorari based only on asserted errors in evaluating witnesses, without alleging or proving denial of its opportunity to prosecute. It cites the phrase grave abuse as automatically reopening the merits. Which is best under Bakal?
- The phrase alone guarantees conviction on review
- Every evidentiary disagreement voids an acquittal
- The State may always obtain a second factual trial
- The label does not establish the narrow exception; the acquittal cannot be reopened on the stated showing
- An acquittal has no finality until the prosecutor agrees
Legal references
- Bakal v. People, G.R. No. 259277, February 2026, main opinion: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2026/feb2026/gr_259277_2026.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.