Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Non-imprisonment for Debt

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A loan contract says the borrower agrees to be jailed whenever payment is late. No criminal offense, lawful contempt basis or other independent detention authority exists. A creditor asks police to enforce only that clause. Which is best?
  1. A private contract creates a new crime and police sentence.
  2. The borrower’s signature gives the creditor judicial power.
  3. Late payment automatically satisfies every criminal element.
  4. The contract alone supplies no lawful authority to imprison for the ordinary unpaid debt.
  5. Police may choose any detention length the creditor wants.

Legal references

  • 1987 Constitution: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/3/353 Article III, Section 20.
  • Lozano v. Martinez, G.R. No. L-63419 et al., December 18, 1986, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1986/dec1986/gr_l-63419_1986.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.