Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Non-impairment of Contracts

Multiple Choice Easy Jurisprudence

Practice question

Which statement about non-impairment and police power follows Ortigas v. Feati?
  1. Any private contract can abolish public-safety regulation
  2. Every invocation of police power is automatically conclusive
  3. The clause protects only unsigned agreements
  4. The non-impairment guarantee must be reconciled with legitimate exercise of police power
  5. Police power is unavailable whenever regulation affects a contract

Legal references

  • 1987 Constitution, Article III, Section 10, non-impairment of contractual obligations: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/3/353
  • Ortigas & Co., Limited Partnership v. Feati Bank and Trust Co., G.R. No. L-24670, December 14, 1979, main decision, non-impairment and legitimate police power: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1979/dec1979/gr_l-24670_1979.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.