Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Non-impairment of Contracts

Multiple Choice Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

A tenant fails to pay rent under a valid lease. No statute or ordinance has altered either party's obligations. The landlord invokes Article III, Section 10 solely because the tenant breached the lease. Which answer is best?
  1. The constitutional clause is not established by private breach alone; ordinary contractual remedies remain relevant
  2. Every unpaid rent automatically invalidates a statute
  3. The clause gives the tenant immunity from contractual liability
  4. A lease is never legally enforceable
  5. The landlord must prove a national emergency to sue for rent

Legal references

  • 1987 Constitution, Article III, Section 10, non-impairment of contractual obligations: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/3/353

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.