Practice question
What distinction did Marcos v. Manglapus draw about returning to one’s own country?
- It is legally identical to purchasing an airline ticket.
- It is necessarily the same question as every domestic relocation.
- The right to return is distinct from the constitutional liberty of abode and right to travel discussed in that case.
- It is a right held only by tour operators.
- It can be decided solely by a private hotel’s policy.
Legal references
- Marcos v. Manglapus, G.R. No. 88211, September 15, 1989, main decision, distinction between travel and return to one’s country: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1989/sep1989/gr_88211_1989.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.