Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Protected and Unprotected Speech

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

In Disini’s actual-malice discussion, is gross or even extreme negligence alone sufficient to establish the required actual malice?
  1. No, the stated standard requires the legally relevant knowledge or reckless disregard of falsity
  2. Yes, any mistake establishes it
  3. Yes, every unverified detail establishes knowing falsity
  4. Yes, the public figure’s anger conclusively proves it
  5. Yes, the number of readers supplies the mental state

Legal references

  • Disini v. Secretary of Justice, G.R. No. 203335 et al., February 11, 2014, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2014/feb2014/gr_203335_2014.html; actual-malice discussion.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.