Practice question
A citizen group, acting independently of candidates, posts a political caricature on private property comparing competing policies through obvious exaggeration. Officials offer no proof of a legally unprotected category but say that satire lacks protection because it ridicules powerful people. Under Diocese, what is the best response?
- Political satire can communicate protected public criticism; ridicule and obvious rhetorical exaggeration alone do not place it outside expression rights.
- Only literal, emotionless statements can be protected.
- Every caricature is automatically a proven criminal libel.
- Private property may never carry political expression.
- Satire is protected only when authored by government.
Legal references
- Diocese of Bacolod v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 205728, January 21, 2015, main decision, political and symbolic expression: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2015/jan2015/gr_205728_2015.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.