Practice question
Why can speech-overbreadth analysis consider effects on persons not before the court?
- Every stranger is automatically guilty
- Third parties lose their speech rights
- The court must approve all future criminal conduct
- Only the challenger’s wealth matters
- Protected expression may be chilled even among absent speakers who avoid risking prosecution
Legal references
- Calleja v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 252578 et al., December 7, 2021, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/dec2021/gr_252578_2021.html
- Disini v. Secretary of Justice, G.R. No. 203335 et al., February 11, 2014, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2014/feb2014/gr_203335_2014.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.