Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Tests to Determine Validity of Governmental Regulation

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A party cites Imbong’s disposition concerning refusal to refer a patient not in an emergency or life-threatening case and claims it conclusively resolves every distinct emergency situation in favor of refusal. No emergency-law analysis is supplied. Which response is sound?
  1. Every qualification in a judgment can be ignored.
  2. The nonemergency qualification and applicable emergency-law framework must be respected; that limited disposition is not an automatic answer to different facts.
  3. All emergencies are legally identical to routine future consultations.
  4. The case abolished every emergency statute.
  5. A citation allows the party to erase the judgment’s wording.

Legal references

  • Imbong v. Ochoa, G.R. No. 204819 et al., April 8, 2014, main decision, free exercise and nonemergency referral: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2014/apr2014/gr_204819_2014.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.