Practice question
A worker falls within the religious exception upheld in Victoriano. The employer proposes dismissal solely because the worker declines the required union affiliation on that ground. What does the cited holding establish?
- A closed-shop contract always overrides the exception.
- The qualifying worker cannot be dismissed solely for nonmembership under the exception.
- Every employment rule disappears.
- The worker may take the employer’s property.
- The law forces the worker to become a union officer.
Legal references
- Victoriano v. Elizalde Rope Workers’ Union, G.R. No. L-25246, September 12, 1974, main decision: https://www.chanrobles.com/scdecisions/jurisprudence1974/sep1974/gr_l_25246_1974.php
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.