Philippine Bar review · Topic

Ex Post Facto Laws and Bills of Attainder

Explore Ex Post Facto Laws and Bills of Attainder in CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which constitutional provision prohibits ex post facto laws and bills of attainder?
  2. Which measure is a classic ex post facto law?
  3. What principally characterizes a bill of attainder?
  4. A person commits an offense when the prescribed maximum prison term is two years. A later law raises it to five years a…
  5. A statute identifies a named group but requires prosecution and judicial proof of specified unlawful acts before punish…
  6. Congress enacts a measure declaring that three named individuals committed an offense last year. It orders them impriso…
  7. A law passed in 2026 makes a previously innocent act criminal and directs prosecutors to convict people for doing it in…
  8. Distinguish an ex post facto law from a bill of attainder. Explain the different constitutional concern each addresses.
  9. An offense carried a maximum two-year prison term when committed. A later statute raises the maximum to five years and …
  10. A statute names a group. One version punishes members immediately without a judicial trial; another requires prosecutio…
  11. Which effect can place a retrospective evidentiary law within the ex post facto categories discussed in Trillanes?
  12. Does the ex post facto prohibition mean every retrospective measure is constitutionally forbidden regardless of its nat…