Practice question
Three proposed eligibility rules are each assumed to require intermediate scrutiny. Rule A pursues a merely trivial aim through a strong connection. Rule B pursues an important aim through a conceded unrelated distinction. Rule C pursues an important aim through a demonstrated substantial relationship. With no other issue, which alone supplies both stated components?
- Rule A alone
- Rule B alone
- All three automatically
- Rule C alone
- None can ever satisfy intermediate scrutiny
Legal references
- Central Bank Employees Association v. Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, G.R. No. 148208, December 15, 2004, main decision, levels of scrutiny: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/45406
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.