Practice question
A court selects intermediate scrutiny for a classification. One party argues that any rational connection is sufficient, while the other insists that every classification must satisfy strict scrutiny. Explain how the court should address these positions.
Legal references
- Samahan ng mga Progresibong Kabataan v. Quezon City, G.R. No. 225442, August 8, 2017, Part II(C), https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/aug2017/gr_225442_2017.html
- White Light Corporation v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 122846, January 20, 2009, Part III(C), https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jan2009/gr_122846_2009.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.