Practice question
A complaint alleges that foreign military officers personally beat a civilian during an entirely private quarrel outside their duties and asks damages from their personal assets. The officers demand dismissal solely because they hold government positions. The allegations of private conduct still require evidence. Under Guinto, what should the court examine?
- Whether the acts were truly official and attributable to the State, rather than treating office alone as conclusive immunity
- Only the officers’ ranks
- Whether any uniform was ever issued to the officers
- Whether the civilian demands more than one peso
- Whether all torts committed by officers automatically bind the foreign treasury
Legal references
- United States of America v. Guinto, G.R. Nos. 76607 et al., February 26, 1990, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1990/feb1990/gr_76607_1990.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.