Practice question
An otherwise constitutionally valid treaty requires the Philippines to observe reciprocal environmental duties. A commentator objects solely that the agreement prevents completely unrestricted unilateral action. Under Tañada, what is the best answer?
- The objection necessarily invalidates every treaty.
- Only trade commitments can ever limit sovereign action.
- The objection is insufficient because voluntary international commitments can validly limit the exercise of sovereign powers.
- A treaty frees the government from all constitutional duties.
- The agreement must be treated as an enemy occupation.
Legal references
- Tañada v. Angara, G.R. No. 118295, May 2, 1997, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1997/may1997/gr_118295_1997.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.