Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Doctrine of Finality of Administrative Action

Multiple Choice Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

An agency issues an order merely setting a hearing and identifying questions still to be decided. It has not determined the parties' substantive rights. A party seeks an ordinary appeal as though the order disposed of the entire case. Assuming no special applicable appeal provision, what is the defect?
  1. The order cannot be administrative because it mentions a hearing.
  2. Every hearing-setting order necessarily grants final relief.
  3. The party must first win a newspaper poll.
  4. The challenged order is interlocutory rather than a final merits disposition.
  5. The court must decide guilt automatically.

Legal references

  • SEC v. CJH Development Corporation, G.R. No. 210316, November 28, 2016, main decision, interlocutory administrative orders: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/62616

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.