Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Preventive Suspension

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

An employee receives wages and benefits during a lawful extension beyond the original thirty-day preventive suspension. After the hearing, the employer validly dismisses the employee. Must the employee reimburse those extension payments merely because dismissal followed?
  1. Yes, all payments become loans
  2. Yes, unless the employee wins a criminal acquittal
  3. Only if the employee had more than one year of service
  4. No; the rule expressly says the employee is not bound to reimburse them in that situation
  5. Yes, because preventive suspension is always a penalty

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/nov2021/gr_227718_2021.html — Lagamayo v. Cullinan Group, Inc., G.R. 227718, November 11, 2021, main decision: Omnibus Rules, Rule XXIII, sections 8–9; thirty-day limit, reinstatement, paid extension and no reimbursement.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2020/feb2020/gr_225100_2020.html — Every Nation Language Institute v. Dela Cruz, G.R. 225100, February 19, 2020, main decision: preventive suspension is protective, not a penalty; justified initial suspension.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/jan2017/gr_207838_2017.html — Maula v. Ximex Delivery Express, Inc., G.R. 207838, January 25, 2017, main decision: serious and imminent threat required.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.