Practice question
A detailed first notice gives an employee adequate response time. The employee submits a defense; a substantial factual dispute remains about whether the employee signed the key document. Management refuses a hearing, then sends a second notice simply saying employment is ended without identifying established grounds. Which is best?
- There is no defect once two papers have been delivered
- The existence of a substantial evidentiary dispute requires a formal hearing or conference, and the decision notice must state the established grounds after consideration
- A second notice is never required after a written defense
- The employee must prove innocence without seeing any accusation
- Any factual dispute automatically cancels employment
Legal references
- https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/10/71535 — DO 147-15, Rule I-A, sections 5.1 and 5.3: detailed notices, at least five calendar days, meaningful opportunity, hearing triggers and authorized-cause notice.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2004/nov2004/gr_158693_2004.html — Agabon v. NLRC, G.R. 158693, November 17, 2004, main decision: substantive just cause distinguished from procedural violation.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2005/mar2005/gr_151378_2005.html — Jaka Food Processing Corp. v. Pacot, G.R. 151378, March 28, 2005, main decision: established authorized cause does not excuse notice violation.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.