Practice question
After an employee reports proven wrongdoing, management retaliates by reducing the employee’s rank and established pay without lawful cause. It admits that the purpose is to make the employee quit. What is the best analysis?
- Calling it reorganization makes it immune from review
- The retaliatory reduction supports constructive dismissal rather than a legitimate transfer
- Only an express dismissal letter could make the conduct actionable
- Keeping the employee on the attendance list makes the reduction lawful
- Any reduction in rank is necessarily a promotion
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/oct2010/gr_163091_2010.html — Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc. v. Del Villar, G.R. 163091, October 6, 2010, main decision: equivalent transfer versus demotion, duties, rank, benefits and bad faith.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/jul2025/gr_245269_2025.html — Saudi Arabian Airlines v. Castells, G.R. 245269, July 28, 2025, main decision: reasonable-person test, proof and voluntary resignation.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/nov2021/gr_227718_2021.html — Lagamayo v. Cullinan Group, Inc., G.R. 227718, November 11, 2021, main decision: employee’s initial proof of dismissal and employer justification.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.