Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Non-diminution of Benefits

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A private employer deliberately grants a lawful benefit consistently over several years, and the evidence establishes that it ripened into company practice. To stop it, the employer merely calls the payments a mistake and offers no adequate supporting proof. Which analysis follows from Arco Metal?
  1. Merely using the word 'mistake' conclusively defeats every established practice.
  2. Every alleged error must be accepted without evidence.
  3. The unsupported mistake claim does not by itself overcome the established protected practice.
  4. Every payment error is necessarily protected forever.
  5. Only one person's preferred description determines the result.

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/presdecs/pd1974/pd_442_1974.html — Labor Code, Article 100.
  • https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/45241 — Arco Metal Products Co., Inc. v. SAMARM-NAFLU, GR 170734, May 14, 2008, main decision.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.