Practice question
Teachers perform equal-value teaching under materially similar conditions. The school already separately compensates foreign-hire dislocation through housing, shipping and travel benefits. It invokes the same dislocation alone to justify an additional basic-salary gap. Which reasoning follows ISAE?
- The separately compensated dislocation does not justify the challenged basic-salary distinction on these facts
- The same factor automatically validates unlimited additional salary gaps
- Relocation necessarily proves superior teaching
- Existing housing benefits eliminate public-policy review
- The local teachers must first show competitors pay them less
Legal references
- ISAE v Quisumbing GR128845 June1,2000 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2000/jun2000/gr_128845_2000.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.