Philippine Bar review · Topic
Built-in Overtime
Explore Built-in Overtime in Overtime Work for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What is the distinction between a lawful built-in overtime payment and a waiver of overtime compensation?
- Under PESALA v NLRC, does a salary above the statutory minimum automatically prove payment of overtime?
- For a covered employee's ordinary-working-day overtime under Article 87, absent a valid special arrangement or more fav…
- A covered worker has an agreed ordinary hourly rate ofPHP 100 and performs two hours of ordinary-day overtime. No compr…
- An express lawful compensation arrangement fully pays two ordinary-day overtime hours at the correct rate. A covered em…
- A guard's appointment specifies 12-hour days and a monthly amount repeatedly described as basic salary. There is no cle…
- An employer cites Engineering Equipment v Minister of Labor to argue that any government-approved contract may waive ov…
- Explain why paying more than the minimum wage does not itself establish lawful built-in overtime compensation.
- A built-in component covers a fixed number of overtime hours, but actual overtime exceeds that number. How should the r…
- Explain the limits of relying on Engineering Equipment as authority for built-in overtime.
- Does employee silence alone establish a clear understanding that the agreed basic salary includes overtime?
- For covered ordinary-day overtime during the statutory night period, is an overtime component automatically a substitut…