Practice question
An injury claimant supplies only proof that a company owns accommodation and quotes a foreign case. The employer disputes whether employment required residence there. Which missing inquiry is material before applying the bunkhouse rationale?
- Whether the employment obligation required the worker’s presence, considering actual freedom to live elsewhere
- Whether the building has a foreign name
- Whether a foreign court would award the largest sum
- Whether ownership alone automatically proves every contract term
- Whether the worker likes the accommodation
Legal references
- Arguilles v Wilhelmsen GR254586 July10,2023 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/jul2023/gr_254586_2023.html Bunkhouse discussion and governing contract.
- Arriesgado v Multinational Maritime GR275424 April29,2026 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2026/apr2026/gr_275424_2026.html Bunkhouse discussion and ECC Resolution24-12-40.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.