Practice question
Two contending unions agree before the Med-Arbiter to an election resolving representation. One later says that no consent election was possible because the Med-Arbiter did not first issue a contested certification-election order. Which is best?
- A contested order is always indispensable despite agreement
- Agreement can never matter in representation
- Only the employer can consent
- The rules recognize the agreed consent-election procedure without requiring that formal contested order
- The agreement automatically selects a winner without voting
Legal references
- DO40-03, RuleVIII Section10; Lepanto GR157086: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/10/42246
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.