Practice question
A proposal would detail a sitting Labor Arbiter to a Commissioner’s office as Commission Attorney to ease workload, without changing the Arbiter’s title. Is retaining the title enough to avoid RA9347’s prohibition?
- No; the statute prohibits both performing those functions and detailing the Arbiter to the office
- Yes; a title always overrides actual assignment
- Yes; workload automatically repeals the restriction
- Yes; every Commissioner may disregard the statute
- Yes; only temporary details are mandatory
Legal references
- RA9347 Sections1–3, Commission organization and qualifications: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2006/ra_9347_2006.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.