Practice question
A proposed labor-development scheme seeks to reduce economic inequality but forbids participants from exercising any lawful initiative and defines permanent dependence as its only objective. Its sponsor claims ArticleXIII makes self-reliance irrelevant. Which is correct?
- The scheme’s premise conflicts with Section2’s express initiative and self-reliance commitment
- Section2 expressly mandates dependence alone
- Any social-justice label makes every method constitutional
- Only cash amount matters under Section2
- Economic opportunities must always exclude worker initiative
Legal references
- 1987 Constitution: https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html ArticleII Section10; ArticleXIII Sections1–2; ArticleIII Section9.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.